| From: | Nick Farrell <nicholas(dot)farrell(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: overlapping ranges |
| Date: | 2018-01-20 22:39:48 |
| Message-ID: | CANGxkfC16MSumQ5Fhe+y9B36YzHDdUB3OU8DArtJ5Oc2a2mq6A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Further down the page, that is contradicted, where there are numeric ranges
spaced every hundred, where it says that is disallowed because of the
ambiguity at the overlap point. Either way, the documentation is
inconsistent.
On 21 Jan. 2018 9:26 am, "Peter Eisentraut" <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 1/20/18 15:58, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/ddl-partitioning.html
> > Description:
> >
> > In the date partitioning example the first and last dates are the first
> of
> > the month, which will cause conflicts. The last date needs to be the
> final
> > day of the same month.
>
> I don't think so, because the upper bound of the range is not included
> in the range.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-01-21 02:47:29 | Re: Correction of intermediate certificate handling |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-01-20 22:26:37 | Re: overlapping ranges |