From: | Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
Date: | 2018-08-22 11:47:27 |
Message-ID: | CANFyU94+wn2iN_ry=2SZFzxdFP6vAHA2+K0uhyyCS4YQWyyrxw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 4:59 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2018-08-21 17:58:00 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 08/21/2018 04:49 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2018-08-21 11:09:15 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > > On 08/21/2018 11:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > XP at least is essentially a dead platform for us. My animals are
> not
> > > > > able to build anything after release 10.
> > > > I wouldn't think XP should even be on our list anymore. Microsoft
> hasn't
> > > > supported it in 4 years.
> > > XP isn't the only thing relevant here, vista and 2008 R1 are in the
> same
> > > class.
> > >
> >
> >
> > I do have a machine in my laptop graveyard with Vista. The only WS2008
> > instace I have available is R2 and AWS doesn't seem to have any AMIs for
> R1.
> >
> > Honestly, I don't think these matter terribly much. Anyone building now
> is
> > not likely to be targeting them.
>
> I agree, I think we should just decree that the minimum is MSVC 2013 and
> that people building 12 need to deal with that. I would personally
> *additionally* would say that we officially don't support *running* (not
> compiling) on XP, 2003, 2008R1 and Vista (all unsupported by MS) - but
> that's a somewhat orthogonal decision.
>
> We build windows binaries (>=9.3) on Windows 7 and Windows Server 2012 R2.
For 9.3, the Visual Studio version is 2010 and for 9.4 and v10, we use
2013. For v11, we use 2017.
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
--
Sandeep Thakkar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-22 12:02:11 | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
Previous Message | Sandeep Thakkar | 2018-08-22 11:44:51 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-22 12:02:11 | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
Previous Message | Sandeep Thakkar | 2018-08-22 11:44:51 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |