| From: | Eudald Valcàrcel Lacasa <eudald(dot)valcarcel(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump negation regex |
| Date: | 2020-05-07 19:54:44 |
| Message-ID: | CANEx+AWBzsuh6R6OM4+DcES+_iBeeGCx4qnx+w=j4qr-Ez==ZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
You're right Rob.
Thanks, it worked!
Eudald
El jue., 7 may. 2020 a las 21:16, Rob Sargent (<robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>)
escribió:
>
>
> > On May 7, 2020, at 1:03 PM, Eudald Valcàrcel Lacasa <
> eudald(dot)valcarcel(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I know the -T command, but I'm trying to regex the "pattern" in -T in
> order to exclude all tables named program_1 onwards.
> > I believe commonly you'd use -T "program_!0", but the ! negation keyword
> is not defined.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eudald
> >
>
> More like ‘program[^0].*’ of there are no leading zero (e.g.09) or
> ‘program[1-9][0-9]*'
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tory M Blue | 2020-05-07 20:33:20 | Memory footprint diff between 9.5 and 12 |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-05-07 19:32:36 | Re: Odd postgres12 upgrade is changing or munging a password? |