From: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG_TEST_EXTRA and meson |
Date: | 2024-07-17 10:34:26 |
Message-ID: | CAN55FZ2sJ4r2qtbs1xxRTrdx2sYCfVKj3=1wR7W1VQQVJADFFg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 13:23, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 13:13, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > xid_wraparound tests are run if PG_TEST_EXTRA contains xid_wraparound
> > or it is not set. Any other setting will not run xid_wraparound test.
> > That's how the patch is coded but it isn't intuitive that changing
> > whether a test is run by default would require configuring the build
> > again. Probably we should just get rid of config time PG_TEST_EXTRA
> > altogether.
> >
> > I am including +Tristan Partin who knows meson better.
> >
> > If you are willing to work on this further, please add it to the commitfest.
>
> I think I know why there is confusion. Could you try to set
> PG_TEST_EXTRA with quotes? Like PG_TEST_EXTRA="ldap mts
> xid_wraparound".
Sorry, the previous reply was wrong; I misunderstood what you said.
Yes, that is how the patch was coded and I agree that getting rid of
config time PG_TEST_EXTRA could be a better alternative.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2024-07-17 11:43:13 | Re: RFC: pg_stat_logmsg |
Previous Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2024-07-17 10:23:19 | Re: PG_TEST_EXTRA and meson |