From: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io |
Date: | 2025-02-06 12:19:00 |
Message-ID: | CAN55FZ0KVdaO8-nMKj7S6ii6bkZMOESnTyMbawiDjAJ=eUVCDg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 08:30, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Please note that I have marked the CF entry at [1] as committed as the
> main goal of this thread has been achieved. Do you want to pursue the
> topic about the potential refactorings in pgstat_tracks_io_op() and
> pgstat_tracks_io_object()? There is a second one with the elimination
> of the write & sync columns for pg_stat_wal. Both should have their
> own thread if worked on, and this thread has been already quite long.
Yes, I would like to work on these.
By saying potential refactorings in pgstat_tracks_io_op() and
pgstat_tracks_io_object(), do you mean converting if statements to
switch statements or something else?
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rushabh Lathia | 2025-02-06 12:38:46 | Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints |
Previous Message | Zhang Mingli | 2025-02-06 12:13:47 | Re: Proposal to CREATE FOREIGN TABLE LIKE |