From: | Dipesh Pandit <dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful |
Date: | 2021-07-27 07:43:00 |
Message-ID: | CAN1g5_GwAENGJGZ56bL7CBN85MFnH+u5ZuNm=J2wmzMQA4j39Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Some minor suggestions:
Thanks for your comments. I have incorporated the changes
and updated a new patch. Please find the attached patch v4.
Thanks,
Dipesh
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 9:44 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> On 7/26/21, 6:31 AM, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > In terms of immediate next steps, I think we should focus on
> > eliminating the O(n^2) problem and not get sucked into a bigger
> > redesign. The patch on the table aims to do just that much and I think
> > that's a good thing.
>
> I agree. I'll leave further discussion about a redesign for another
> thread.
>
> Nathan
>
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-mitigate-directory-scan-for-WAL-archiver.patch | text/x-patch | 10.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2021-07-27 07:52:00 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-07-27 07:38:48 | Re: alter table set TABLE ACCESS METHOD |