Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options

From: Krasiyan Andreev <krasiyan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Oliver Ford <ojford(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options
Date: 2025-03-29 07:51:55
Message-ID: CAN1PwomkQhCb50oF8cUJUkjgdwCjPKXLW10_DdoPR_baPxLi=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,
Patch applies and compiles, all included tests passed and after the latest
fixes for non-nulls array, performance is near to lead/lag without support
of "ignore nulls".
I have been using the last version for more than one month in a production
environment with real data and didn't find any bugs, so It is ready for
committer status.

На чт, 13.03.2025 г. в 9:49 Oliver Ford <ojford(at)gmail(dot)com> написа:

>
>
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025, 20:07 Oliver Ford, <ojford(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 6:40 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>> > Attached version removes the non-nulls array. That seems to speed
>>> > everything up. Running the above query with 1 million rows averages
>>> 450ms,
>>> > similar when using lead/lag.
>>>
>>> Great. However, CFbot complains about the patch:
>>>
>>> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6364194477441024
>>>
>>>
>> Attached fixes the headerscheck locally.
>>
>
> v11 attached because the previous version was broken by commit 8b1b342
>
>>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2025-03-29 08:12:24 Re: support ALTER TABLE DROP EXPRESSION for virtual generated column
Previous Message Julien Tachoires 2025-03-29 07:46:01 Re: Allow table AMs to define their own reloptions