On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 18:45, Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)dndg(dot)it> wrote:
> > Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
> > version number?
>
> Seems fine to me.
>
For what is worth my opinion, I, too, think psycopg alone is ok.
Ciao.
Marco.