Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?

From: Marco Beri <marcoberi(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)dndg(dot)it>
Cc: psycopg(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Date: 2020-11-10 17:47:39
Message-ID: CAN1J36ijxTkzYmUuXkSQGe0pqjT268mPXBNq1zdcTZc6nuJwHw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: psycopg

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 18:45, Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)dndg(dot)it> wrote:

> > Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
> > version number?
>
> Seems fine to me.
>

For what is worth my opinion, I, too, think psycopg alone is ok.

Ciao.
Marco.

In response to

Browse psycopg by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2020-11-10 17:59:58 Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Previous Message Federico Di Gregorio 2020-11-10 17:44:53 Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?