| From: | Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |
| Date: | 2013-04-09 18:52:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAN1EF+y9rwzGpJqjzjB56th8uKH5DVJQd0wkB1Fkfnb_yDw-DA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Selena Deckelmann (selena(at)chesnok(dot)com) wrote:
> > None are empowered to sign contracts or legally represent the developers
> > who make up PGDG.
>
> It is not the developers comprised of PGDG who are required to sign into
> an NDA. It is company A, B, or C who would need to sign an NDA with "some
> legal entity", giving that legal entity the power/right to sue company A,
> B, or C, were they to release the information provided to them
> inappropriately under a breach of contract.
>
> Notionally, perhaps a PGDG developer would provide the data to the
> 'legal entity' who would then provide the information to the company, to
> legitimatize the contract, but that would not require any NDA or
> contract to be signed by the PGDG developer.
>
Hmmm. Interesting.
Yeah, not a fan :)
-selena
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2013-04-09 19:21:52 | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2013-04-09 18:22:44 | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |