| From: | Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)maxipad(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Renee <renee(dot)phillips(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here |
| Date: | 2019-10-02 06:47:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAN1EF+xW6OT=3gWm-40qCC+0KnJ6ag7LcNdYYqKeMjsKfPDioQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hi!
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:06 AM Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> I know that I tend towards primary/replica when discussing physical
> replication, and we do that quite a bit in the documentation (consider
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/warm-standby.html where we seem to be
> pretty confused about if we want to talk about the system as a 'primary'
> or as a 'master'- but *clearly* primary is winning the war there).
It has the advantage of being accurate and with significantly less social
baggage.
I support a search and replace.
-selena
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oto Brglez | 2019-10-02 07:55:14 | "DROP INDEX" correction |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2019-10-02 06:06:53 | Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here |