From: | patrick keshishian <pkeshish(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "William E(dot) Moreno A(dot)" <wmoreno3(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Artis(dot)Caune(at)latnet(dot)lv" <Artis(dot)Caune(at)latnet(dot)lv> |
Subject: | Re: FATAL: the database system is starting up |
Date: | 2011-11-01 12:43:53 |
Message-ID: | CAN0yQBrXrg=25VMYyEUNzrik8XeivRFdWBmPW_FOxoSvZ2LWrg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:09 PM, patrick keshishian <pkeshish(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:49 PM, William E. Moreno A.
>> <wmoreno3(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Solution: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-12/msg01339.php
>>> Solution: Message-id: <476D6DE1(dot)4050600(at)latnet(dot)lv>
>>> <text/plain>
>>>
>>> Problem: FATAL: the database system is starting up
>>>
>>> Solved: change postgresql_flags in /etc/rc.conf to: postgresql_flags="-s -m fast" or postgresql_flags="-s -m smart"
>>
>> interesting enough, got bit by this recently. Our set up does not have
>> a "-w" option. During upgrades we "cycle" our PostgreSQL daemon. We
>> had to change the "pg_ctl stop" command to "-mimmediate" because
>> during upgrades we would find that someone had an abandoned psql shell
>> running for days and that would halt our upgrade script.
>>
>> Adding "-m immediate" for shutdown seemed like a logical choice to get
>> around this sort of a "procedural" issue(s).
>
> didn't -m fast work?
I forget now why "-m fast" wasn't used. I tried to dig up anything I
had in my notes and did a set of new experiments (hence the late
reply), but didn't come up with much.
About the only difference with '-m fast' and '-m immediate' seems to
be the following log entry:
.... database system was
not properly shut down; automatic recovery in progress
For now, I've changed the script to use '-m fast' and removed the
sleep. Will find out after some moderate use of it whether it was a
wise decision or not :-)
--patrick
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ktm@rice.edu | 2011-11-01 12:53:42 | Re: Performance Problem with postgresql 9.03, 8GB RAM,Quadcore Processor Server--Need help!!!!!!! |
Previous Message | mailtolouis2020-postgres@yahoo.com | 2011-11-01 11:44:19 | Re: pglesslog for Postgres 9.1.1 |