From: | Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE |
Date: | 2019-03-25 01:04:24 |
Message-ID: | CAN-V+g-Bpv-Uxm1Rjw1dwLWk6-rXLpysNjRFyeeqg_9=ayiFwA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I am unable to get latest patches I found [1] to apply cleanly to current
branches. It's possible I missed the latest patches so if I'm using the
wrong ones please let me know. I tried against master, 11.2 stable and the
11.2 tag with similar results. It's quite possible it's user error on my
end, I am new to this process but didn't have issues with the previous
patches when I tested those a couple weeks ago.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5C8ECAA4.3090301@anastigmatix.net
Ryan Lambert
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 5:07 PM Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> wrote:
> On 03/23/19 18:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Out of curiosity, what further processing would you expect libxml to do?
> >
> > Hm, I'd have thought it'd try to parse the arguments to some extent,
> > but maybe not. Does everybody reimplement attribute parsing for
> > themselves when using PIs?
>
> Yeah, the content of a PI (whatever's after the target name) is left
> all to be defined by whatever XML-using application might care about
> that PI.
>
> It could have an attribute=value syntax inspired by XML elements, or
> some other form entirely, but there'd just better not be any ?> in it.
>
> Regards,
> -Chap
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zhang, Jie | 2019-03-25 01:31:51 | ALTER TABLE with ADD COLUMN and ADD PRIMARY KEY USING INDEX throws spurious "column contains null values" |
Previous Message | Tatsuro Yamada | 2019-03-25 01:01:46 | Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor |