From: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | nickb <nickb(at)imap(dot)cc> |
Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated when modifying privileges |
Date: | 2019-05-14 06:08:05 |
Message-ID: | CAN-RpxAgXWxttz9HCr1jAtnPXLnW7ezeLZ6G8+aCMu8gy+EDjg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:26 AM nickb <nickb(at)imap(dot)cc> wrote:
> Hello, hackers
>
> we witnessed this slightly misleading error in production and it took us a
> while to figure out what was taking place.
> Below are reproduction steps:
>
>
> -- setup
> create table trun(cate int4);
>
> -- session 1
> begin;
> truncate table trun;
>
> -- session 2
> grant insert on table trun to postgres;
>
> -- session 1
> end;
>
> -- session 2:
> ERROR: XX000: tuple concurrently updated
> LOCATION: simple_heap_update, heapam.c:4474
>
> Apparently the tuple in question is the pg_class entry of the table being
> truncated. I didn't look too deep into the cause, but I'm certain the error
> message could be improved at least.
>
Having thought about this a bit, I think the best solution would be to have
grant take out an access share lock to the tables granted. This would
prevent concurrent alter table operations from altering the schema
underneath the grant as well, and thus possibly cause other race conditions.
Any thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Nick.
>
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Chris Travers
Head of Database
Tel: +49 162 9037 210 | Skype: einhverfr | www.adjust.com
Saarbrücker Straße 37a, 10405 Berlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2019-05-14 06:18:07 | Re: Tab completion for CREATE TYPE |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-05-14 05:50:58 | Tab completion for CREATE TYPE |