Re: RFC: Pluggable TOAST

From: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Pluggable TOAST
Date: 2023-10-26 20:56:12
Message-ID: CAN-LCVOf3tvpF6+4w_o0LUc_UiBa=-rhS-YCBTsAyOWpoBj0YQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

Matthias, thank you for your patience and explanation. I'd wish I had it
much earlier, it would save a lot of time.
You've asked a lot of good questions, and the answers we have for some
seem to be not very satisfactory, and pointed out some topics that were not
mentioned before. I have to rethink our approach to the TOAST enhancements
according to it.

Thanks a lot!

--
Regards,
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company
https://postgrespro.ru/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2023-10-26 21:02:20 Add recovery to pg_control and remove backup_label
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-10-26 20:43:33 Recovering from detoast-related catcache invalidations