Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade

From: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade
Date: 2023-10-16 12:10:16
Message-ID: CAN-LCVO-XWe5OzJ69t9XgEbwr+dqMUsy84UOMTMCT-RoBtRuNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Thank you very much, I'll check it out. It looks like the
getObjectIdentity() used in
pg_identify_object() could do.

--
Regards,
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company
https://postgrespro.ru/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2023-10-16 12:49:15 Re: remaining sql/json patches
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2023-10-16 12:05:57 Re: PL/pgSQL: Incomplete item Allow handling of %TYPE arrays, e.g. tab.col%TYPE[]