From: | James David Smith <james(dot)david(dot)smith(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Don't understand error? |
Date: | 2014-04-14 14:25:33 |
Message-ID: | CAMu32AAkAWdrZ_oA=jqpuHTsOraB3ATxOWog8KARA2x2PV4kxQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Good tip. Thanks. I don't think there are many values stored like
that, so it should make it a bit easier to find.
On 14 April 2014 15:24, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> James David Smith <james(dot)david(dot)smith(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Yes, I thought the same. Glad to know that I might be along the right
>> lines. I've started taking parameters out one-by-one to try and find
>> the culprit. Yes, there are a variety of numbers stored as NUMERIC in
>> various places. For example:
>
> AFAIR, there is no such thing as an underflow error in the type-NUMERIC
> code --- it will happily round to zero instead. You should be looking for
> something involving float4 or float8 (aka real/double precision).
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ss dev | 2014-04-14 20:40:50 | Re: Images stored in bytea datatype |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-14 14:24:19 | Re: Don't understand error? |