From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Breen Hagan <breen(at)rtda(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled |
Date: | 2016-11-21 08:33:47 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YHsgmgqesdzfbb1uT-nJ3QeRnvXagG3yQPNckspcq8P4g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 8 November 2016 at 14:31, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com]
>> I just looked more deeply at your refactoring patch, and I didn't know about
>> CheckTokenMembership()... The whole logic of your patch depends on it.
>> That's quite a cleanup that you have here. It looks that the former
>> implementation just had no knowledge of this routine or it would just have
>> been used.
>
> Yes, Microsoft recommends GetTokenMembership() because it's simpler.
You meant CheckTokenMembership().
Relevant references:
* https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa376389(v=vs.85).aspx
The docs say it's supported in WinXP and Win2k3, so it's fine to use.
The blog above notes that it "won't work" on Vista+, but if you read
it you'll notice that what it means is that you can't tell if the
running user has the right to elevate to Administrator rights. I don't
think PostgreSQL cares about that, it only cares if it has admin
rights *right now*, not whether the running user can gain such rights
using a UAC elevation prompt. In fact it'd be super-annoying if you
couldn't run postgres as a user with admin elevation rights so this
behaviour seems to be what we want.
The proposed patch does need to be checked with:
* WinXP, non-admin
* WinXP, admin, should refuse to run
* WinVista / Win7, local admin, UAC on => should run
* WinVista / Win7, local admin, UAC off => should refuse to run
* WinVista / Win7, run cmd.exe using "run as admin" => should refuse to run
* WinVista / Win7, not local admin => should run
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2016-11-22 04:58:34 | Re: Re: BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled |
Previous Message | Sandeep Thakkar | 2016-11-21 07:07:14 | Re: BUG #14425: Installation issues |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-11-21 08:37:50 | Re: Document how to set up TAP tests for Perl 5.8.8 |
Previous Message | Kouhei Kaigai | 2016-11-21 08:29:33 | Re: PassDownLimitBound for ForeignScan/CustomScan [take-2] |