Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq
Date: 2016-01-26 16:54:42
Message-ID: CAMsr+YHa3TfA4rKtnZuzurwCSmxxXNQHFE3UE29BoDEQcwfuxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27 January 2016 at 00:16, Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
wrote:

> It says more about the modules, and not about libpq. Using gendef.pl for
> this library in the light of the development of my CMake build seems silly.
>
>
For what it's worth I personally agree. I'd rather have PGDLLEXPORT used
directly, not least because it'd let us built with -fvisibility=hidden
under *nix. But I'm in the minority and not inclined to push the point.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-01-26 17:20:30 Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-01-26 16:42:26 Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport