From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: handling of heap rewrites in logical decoding |
Date: | 2018-03-21 07:08:52 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YHSbTPH=O6sDk3+SMTwZN1herrzrV6ErR_Byr+73Fjw_Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16 March 2018 at 10:54, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 16 March 2018 at 08:51, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)
> com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/28/18 13:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:> Second version, which uses an
>> OID. I added another field to the output> plugin options (next to the
>> output_type), to indicate whether the plugin> wants to receive these
>> changes. I added some test cases to> test_decoding to show how it works
>> either way. It's a bit messy to pass> this setting through to the
>> ReorderBuffer; maybe there is a better idea.> But the result seems
>> pretty useful.
>> Here is a rebased update of this patch. No functionality changes
>> compared to v2.
>>
>
>
> Picking this up for review.
>
>
Why was relrewrite / Anum_pg_class_relrewrite inserted at position 28, not
appended to pg_class?
I don't see how it'd cause any harm, I'm just curious about the rationale.
Otherwise, I'm totally happy with what I see here. It's always nice to get
to the end of a patch and think "wait, that's all?"
Ready to go.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-03-21 07:18:17 | Re: missing support of named convention for procedures |
Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2018-03-21 07:08:13 | Re: Question about WalSndWriteData |