Re: Processes and caches in postgresql

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Processes and caches in postgresql
Date: 2016-05-03 14:35:04
Message-ID: CAMsr+YHPBSJspzK8+FChM3WFgNBiWz_yu+HVh_0ccjpVgzXSfA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3 May 2016 at 21:37, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> There is library out there, unfortunately GPL licensed, that attempts
> to fully implement posix including fork(): http://midipix.org/. One
> of these days I'd like to have a go at porting postgres to it.

... and here I thought you'd be keen to instead remove all use of globals
and 'static' locals to allow thread-safe state tracking, remove use of
shmem, introduce threaded backends, replace use of signals, and release
ThreadedPostgres.

Sounds fun, right? :p

More seriously, shouldn't Microsoft's new (or at least re-blessed and
re-released with a new paint job) Linux/POSIX support offer us some options
here? I suspect not - they're probably restricted to ELF binaries that
won't be able to link to native Windows DLLs to get support for things like
SSPI auth, native Windows SSL API use, etc. But it's worth keeping the
possibility in mind.

Frankly, a library that implements fork() might cause exciting explosions
when using native Windows services, too.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-05-03 14:36:22 Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2016-05-03 14:28:36 Re: full table delete query