| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464a3(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BDR |
| Date: | 2016-06-12 14:12:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YGxzz2DYyRNPVd0DL2k-Zb4n7aDtkTzqUR-SSUT4v+0WQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11 June 2016 at 02:26, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464a3(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry if this question was asked before. As I understand currently
>> BDR does not support the replicating nodes to run different major
>> versions, like
>> 9.4 <-> 9.5.
>>
>> Is this in the works?
>>
>
> This seems relevant...
>
> http://bdr-project.org/docs/stable/logical-vs-physical.html
>
>
>
> But you question seems vague since BDR is a concept for which many
> implementations exist.
>
I think they're specifically referring to 2ndQ's BDR project here, rather
than bi-directional logical replication general.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-06-12 14:14:19 | Re: BDR |
| Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2016-06-12 11:30:54 | Re: Sequences, txids, and serial order of transactions |