From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Curing plpgsql's memory leaks for statement-lifespan values |
Date: | 2016-07-22 05:24:07 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YGwc0xte1wp_aqBFiWbXvf=tEG4U-JC8yZWSzsjQv5-Ug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22 July 2016 at 07:02, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> In
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/tencent_5C738ECA65BAD6861AA43E8F@qq.com
> it was pointed out that you could get an intra-function-call memory leak
> from something like
>
> LOOP
> BEGIN
> EXECUTE 'bogus command';
> EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
> END;
> END LOOP;
...
>
> Another answer is to invent a third per-function memory context intended
> to hold statement-lifespan variables.
>
>
I've wanted this in the past and been surprised we don't have it, so +1
from me.
I don't think a few MemoryContextAlloc's are too ugly.
I suggest that in cassert builds, or maybe just CACHE_CLOBBER_ALWAYS, the
context is reset after each call even when not cleaning up after an error.
That'll help catch mistakes and leaks.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-07-22 05:24:51 | Re: Curing plpgsql's memory leaks for statement-lifespan values |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-07-22 05:19:33 | Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol |