Re: Curing plpgsql's memory leaks for statement-lifespan values

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Curing plpgsql's memory leaks for statement-lifespan values
Date: 2016-07-22 05:24:07
Message-ID: CAMsr+YGwc0xte1wp_aqBFiWbXvf=tEG4U-JC8yZWSzsjQv5-Ug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22 July 2016 at 07:02, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> In
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/tencent_5C738ECA65BAD6861AA43E8F@qq.com
> it was pointed out that you could get an intra-function-call memory leak
> from something like
>
> LOOP
> BEGIN
> EXECUTE 'bogus command';
> EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
> END;
> END LOOP;

...

>
> Another answer is to invent a third per-function memory context intended
> to hold statement-lifespan variables.
>
>
I've wanted this in the past and been surprised we don't have it, so +1
from me.

I don't think a few MemoryContextAlloc's are too ugly.

I suggest that in cassert builds, or maybe just CACHE_CLOBBER_ALWAYS, the
context is reset after each call even when not cleaning up after an error.
That'll help catch mistakes and leaks.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-07-22 05:24:51 Re: Curing plpgsql's memory leaks for statement-lifespan values
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-07-22 05:19:33 Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol