From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #1) |
Date: | 2018-03-04 01:49:35 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YGbSbkqBJcMCR3-=Jq9zuCGkGHQXzwAzn8bm1Y3dBqY+g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2 March 2018 at 02:37, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2018-03-01 14:09:02 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >>> A bit concerned that we're turning pgbench into a kitchen sink.
>
> >> I do not understand "kitchen sink" expression in this context, and your
> >> general concerns about pgbench in various comments in your message.
>
> > We're adding a lot of stuff to pgbench that only a few people
> > use. There's a lot of duplication with similar parts of code in other
> > parts of the codebase. pgbench in my opinion is a tool to facilitate
> > postgres development, not a goal in itself.
>
> FWIW, I share Andres' concern that pgbench is being extended far past
> what anyone has shown a need for. If we had infinite resources this
> wouldn't be a big problem, but it's eating into limited committer hours
> and I'm not really convinced that we're getting adequate return.
I have similar worries about us growing an ad-hoc scripting language in
psql.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-03-04 01:56:28 | Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #1) |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-03-04 01:46:17 | Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql - additional extra checks |