| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Bondwal <bondwal(dot)amit(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is BDR support distributed table on slave nodes with ACID and join support. |
| Date: | 2015-07-17 12:49:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YGZ47Ud5hHcgA3K_0pVCeD=BE6+Oq=p_KFGFF0piKwnrw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 17 July 2015 at 19:37, Amit Bondwal <bondwal(dot)amit(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thank you very much all of you for quick response and clearing my mind.
Please reply to the mailing list, not just to me directly.
> One more question, can I run a databse of postgres 9.4 on postgres-XL
> cluster?
postgres-XL is based on PostgreSQL 9.2, so no.
Postgres-XL doesn't "run on" PostgreSQL. It's a modified (forked)
version of PostgreSQL.
> Or you can advise me any better solution.
Not without knowing a lot more about what you're trying to do, what
your requirements are, etc.
> As per my knowledge partitioning
> of a table have some limits in nos. and I can't extend more storage in a
> server upto a limit.
Yes, that's true, but those limits are quite large, and you may be
trying to solve a problem you don't and won't have.
This may well be premature optimisation. I can't know without a lot more info.
Rather than starting with the solution (horizontal partitioning,
sharding) try starting with the problem and requirements, then looking
for solutions from there.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Bondwal | 2015-07-17 13:08:44 | Re: Is BDR support distributed table on slave nodes with ACID and join support. |
| Previous Message | Sachin Srivastava | 2015-07-17 12:47:48 | Getting error "IST FATAL: the database system is in recovery mode" |