From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
Date: | 2015-11-06 05:43:33 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YGXTK3+i5zL3AkkR5BRP+Tw+f4+Ph=Z2_g7KD-nbb+cYg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On 6 November 2015 at 13:34, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> But some options control how
>> next host should be choosen (i.e. use random order for load-balancing
>> or sequential order for high availability), so they should be specified
>> only once per connect string.
>
> But this seems like a point worthy of consideration.
This makes me think that trying to wedge this into the current API
using a funky connection string format might be a mistake.
Lots of these issues would go away if you could provide more than just
a connstring.
>> Third category of options are specified per-cluster much more often
>> than per node. But are quite often changed from compiled in default.
>
> This, too.
Like this. If you have a global set of connection options, then
per-connection options, it's a lot simpler.
I guess that can be hacked in with a more dramatic change in the
connstring format, otherwise, incorporating subsections or something.
I'm not keen on doing anything like that, but there are all sorts of
options...
"global:[user=fred port=5432] host1:[host=somehost user=user1]
host2:[host=localhost]"
(puts head in brown paper bag)
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2015-11-06 05:49:45 | Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-06 05:42:56 | Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-11-06 15:38:07 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-06 05:34:27 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |