| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove Windows crash dump support? |
| Date: | 2015-12-24 02:18:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YG=UOZeiA1Z=U3VE-A6F_QdOtNKwkXF=MirmD3BSTBc6A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22 December 2015 at 23:46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > In which version(s) of Windows was this improvement added?
Vista and Server 2008 (original, not R2).
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb787181(v=vs.85).aspx
Win7 and Server 2003 are already irrelevant now, and will be absurdly so by
the time Pg 9.6 comes out.
The windows feature works better than the in-application crash dump. It can
limit the number of dumps, for one thing, and it doesn't require a sane and
intact stack to work.
> Even if it's all good in recent Windows, the impression I have is that an
> awful lot of people are still running older versions, so I'd be pretty
> hesitant to just drop the code.
Yeah, if it was new in Win2012 I'd agree, but it's been around since 2008.
> Also, AFAICS it's pretty self-contained
> and hence not much of a drag on development. Is there any positive reason
> to remove it?
Not really. It also does nothing by default, so it's pretty harmless and
mostly dead code.
I just thought it was worth bringing up that there's a better way to do it
now and nobody seems to use it anyway.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-24 02:20:00 | Re: WIP: Fix parallel workers connection bug in pg_dump (Bug #13727) |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-12-24 02:18:02 | Re: Remove Windows crash dump support? |