From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal |
Date: | 2016-07-28 01:22:17 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YFz63drDzjTwmTWSzvop7V+axrK1Ncq56aSNhqbULJmow@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 28 July 2016 at 04:35, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:18:28AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On 7 July 2016 at 21:10, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > pg_upgrade does that, kinda. I'd like to have something better, but
> > in the absence of that, I think it's quite wrong to think about
> > deprecating it, even if we had logical replication fully integrated
> > into core today. Which we by no means do.
> >
> > I don't see any problem with extending pg_upgrade to use logical
> replication
> > features under the covers.
> >
> > It seems very smooth to be able to just say
> >
> > pg_upgrade --online
> >
> > and then specify whatever other parameters that requires.
> >
> > It would be much easier to separate out that as a use-case so we can be
> sure we
> > get that in 10.0, even if nothing else lands.
>
> Uh, while "pg_upgrade --online" looks cool, I am not sure a solution
> based on logical replication would share _any_ code with the existing
> pg_upgrade tool, so it seems best to use another binary for this.
>
It might, actually. One approach for online upgrade is to:
* pg_basebackup the master
* start the replica and let it catch up
* create a logical replication slot on the master
* replace the replication.conf on the basebackup so it stops recovery at
the lsn of the replication slot's confirmed_flush_lsn
* stop the replica and pg_upgrade it
* have the upgraded replica, now a master, replay from the old master over
logical replication
* once caught up, switch over
This means a full dump and reload with a full rebuild of all indexes, etc,
isn't needed. All shared catalog stuff is copied (until we switch to
logical rep for the final catch-up).
I guess we could use the pg_dump/pg_restore pg_upgrade code to create
> the objects, and use logical replication to copy the rows, but what does
> this gain us that pg_dump/pg_restore doesn't?
A consistent switch-over point, where the upgrade can happen while the
master is still writing.
We create a slot, dump from the slot's exported snapshot, and switch over
to logical replication consistently at the end of the dump.
That's pretty much what BDR and pglogical do.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-07-28 02:38:33 | Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal |
Previous Message | Kouhei Kaigai | 2016-07-28 01:01:41 | Re: Oddity in EXPLAIN for foreign/custom join pushdown plans |