Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?
Date: 2018-07-12 01:33:21
Message-ID: CAMsr+YFhh_C=D-ek9PnC9O570hBWPJ+Qde=ZAe0-6FpwTgsjiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12 July 2018 at 09:10, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <
tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:

> From: Nico Williams [mailto:nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com]
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:29:12AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> > > How can one make defensive use of his patent if he allows everyone to
> > > use it royalty-free? Can he use his patent for cross-licensing
> > > negotiation if some commercial database vendor accuses his company
> > > that PostgreSQL unintentionally infringes that vendor's patent?
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_termination
>
> Thank you, his looks reasonable to give everyone the grant. Then, I
> wonder if the community can accept patented code if the patent holder
> grants this kind of license.

Personally, I'd be in favour, but the core team has spoken here. I'm not
privy to the discussion but the outcome seems firm.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo Nagata 2018-07-12 01:44:36 Re: Preferring index-only-scan when the cost is equal
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-07-12 01:28:37 Re: Accounting of zero-filled buffers in EXPLAIN (BUFFERS)