Re: Redefining inet_net_ntop

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Redefining inet_net_ntop
Date: 2018-01-29 04:31:09
Message-ID: CAMsr+YFe82oOac=WMqxjhBsn7kEc8VC6t_f6A4Pjz7yzhzujbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29 January 2018 at 17:07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>
> Another choice would be to stick a pg_ prefix on the function name.
>

That, plus a comment, seems just fine to me.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-01-29 04:34:21 Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations
Previous Message Jing Wang 2018-01-29 04:29:35 Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Separate log file for extension