Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Manuel Kniep <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de>, "fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: 2016-11-22 07:31:52
Message-ID: CAMsr+YFU7zDfUCN2_qWR7B6nd58mQj+zcGabq4yA3E=5YzfArg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22 November 2016 at 15:14, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> The latest is what's attached upthread and what's in the git repo also
>> referenced upthread.
>>
>> I haven't been able to update in response to more recent review due to
>> other development commitments. At this point I doubt I'll be able to
>> get update it again in time for v10, so anyone who wants to adopt it
>> is welcome.
>
>
> Currently patch status is marked as "returned with feedback" in the 11-2016
> commitfest. Anyone who wants to work on it can submit the updated patch
> by taking care of all review comments and change the status of the patch
> at any time.
>
> Thanks for the patch.

Thanks. Sorry I haven't had time to work on it. Priorities.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-11-22 07:38:46 Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-11-22 07:17:57 Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.