From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Trivial doc fix in logicaldecoding.sgml |
Date: | 2016-01-28 08:42:18 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YFT5ocX=k=gSsoMBsGR7C9z0OqRpg8jM2=H62UH=VEwrA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 28 January 2016 at 16:36, Shulgin, Oleksandr <
oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Shulgin, Oleksandr
>> <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Please find attached a simple copy-paste fix for CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT
>> > syntax.
>>
>> We should change also START_REPLICATION SLOT syntax document as follows?
>>
>> - <para><literal>START_REPLICATION SLOT
>> <replaceable>slot_name</replaceable> LOGICAL
>> <replaceable>options</replaceable></literal></para>
>> + <para><literal>START_REPLICATION SLOT
>> <replaceable>slot_name</replaceable> LOGICAL
>> <replaceable>XXX/XXX</replaceable>
>> (<replaceable>options</replaceable>)</literal></para>
>>
>
> If a committer would thinks so, I don't object. Though this one is rather
> a detail for which the reader is already referred to protocol-replication,
> while my fix was about a factual error.
>
>
I think it should be changed. I've already had people confused by this.
Either that or remove the synopsis entirely, changing it to
START_REPLICATION SLOT ....
and linking to the protocol docs. Which might be better.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2016-01-28 08:45:18 | Re: Declarative partitioning |
Previous Message | Shulgin, Oleksandr | 2016-01-28 08:36:06 | Re: Trivial doc fix in logicaldecoding.sgml |