| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CTE inlining |
| Date: | 2017-05-02 02:38:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YFRVCavAxeVAqbwMXsv=ZrgW5h4Wjhzx9NUnKB11G4ZKQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1 May 2017 at 22:26, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
> I am not sure I like decorators since this means adding an ad hoc query hint
> directly into the SQL syntax which is something which I requires serious
> consideration.
And mangling the semantics of existing syntax doesn't?
That's what we do right now so we can pretend we don't have query
hints while still having query hints.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-02 02:42:18 | Re: CTE inlining |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-02 02:24:56 | Re: A design for amcheck heapam verification |