| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: POC: converting Lists into arrays |
| Date: | 2019-08-08 06:10:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YFE_UgzdMo77k1xSNjzhWmAh_dmW5c3bd_LfZKPeSZeJw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 12:18, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-08-08 11:36:44 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> > > you can only put one <declaration> into the first element of a
> > > for (;;).
> > >
> >
> > Use an anonymous block outer scope? Or if not permitted even by C99
> (which
> > I think it is), a do {...} while (0); hack?
>
> You can't easily - the problem is that there's no real way to add the
> closing }, because that's after the macro.
Ah, right. Hence our
PG_TRY();
{
}
PG_CATCH();
{
}
PG_END_TRY();
construct in all its beauty.
I should've seen that.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark G | 2019-08-08 06:46:06 | Small const correctness patch |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-08-08 05:50:54 | Re: Problem with default partition pruning |