Re: fun with "Ready for Committer" patches

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fun with "Ready for Committer" patches
Date: 2016-03-09 02:44:58
Message-ID: CAMsr+YEz7OAqNR=_utoM+Ls5-3_jyKLQW_S9n5pNk1cBd3tOEQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9 March 2016 at 07:18, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:

>
> Many of "needs review" state patches already have reviewer(s). Do you
> mean we want more reviewers in addition to them for such patches?
>

Yeah. Personally I'm not too confident about what precisely is required to
move a patch from needs-review to ready-for-committer. I've done a chunk of
review for a number of patches, but I'm not always confident saying "all
clear, proceed".

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-03-09 02:55:06 Re: fun with "Ready for Committer" patches
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2016-03-09 02:31:08 Re: syslog configurable line splitting behavior