| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Prabakaran, Vaishnavi" <VaishnaviP(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Manuel Kniep <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de>, "fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq |
| Date: | 2017-03-13 01:32:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YEyn2RWDMZN8Qbpms-+u6ZhZ-eieNYVSfwiCYHYkDZSHw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13 March 2017 at 08:54, Vaishnavi Prabakaran
<vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Before going with this fix, I would like you to consider the option of
> asking batch processing users(via documentation) to set single-row mode
> before calling PQgetResult().
> Either way we need to fix the documentation part, letting users know how
> they can activate single-row mode while using batch processing.
> Let me know your thoughts.
Thanks for looking into this, it's clear that I didn't cover the combo
of single-row-mode and batch mode adequately.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-03-13 01:50:23 | Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) |
| Previous Message | Neha Khatri | 2017-03-13 01:22:06 | Why is there a doubtful copyObject call in add_vars_to_targetlist |