From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Make pg_regress print a connstring with sockdir |
Date: | 2017-08-28 11:57:59 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YEukaJMUe7mNNRV+D-hGT0KxURBi2r2a5MuhAFonWbYfg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 28 August 2017 at 19:45, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > It's a pain having to find the postmaster command line to get the port
> > pg_regress started a server on. We print the port in the pg_regress
> output,
> > why not the socket directory / host?
>
> I'm not following the point here. The test postmaster isn't really
> going to be around long enough to connect to it manually. If you
> want to do that, you should be using "installcheck", and then the
> problem doesn't arise.
>
> The reason for printing the port number, if memory serves, is to
> aid in debugging port selection conflicts. That doesn't really
> apply for temporary socket directories; we're expecting libc to
> avoid any conflicts there.
>
I'm frequently debugging postmasters that are around long enough.
Deadlocks, etc.
It's also way easier to debug shmem related issues with a live postmaster
vs a core.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-08-28 12:06:09 | Re: standby server crashes hard on out-of-disk-space in HEAD |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-28 11:45:01 | Re: Make pg_regress print a connstring with sockdir |