From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RPM Morgue |
Date: | 2018-06-27 02:49:41 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YEiwVGGeL8=XwfYm84+0eopqAHAJhske2iMNESoS80HsA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
On 27 June 2018 at 07:40, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>
> I'm not against keeping the old package, but there are two things:
>
> * We need to ask sysadmins team, because this means a lot of extra disk
> space.
>
I'm not averse to hosting elsewhere, I just know Pg infra likes to keep
control where they can.
* Building older packages is not that hard with the RPMs as you know -- just
> change the version number, and run make rpm11 (or whatever). I'm not sure
> that
> keeping the old packages are worth the hassle.
>
Unfortunately that's not useful. You need *exactly matching* debuginfo
packages for the same build-IDs. You can't just rebuild the suite and
extract the debuginfo packages to install on another host.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2018-06-27 15:33:55 | PG11 beta lists x86_64 twice |
Previous Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2018-06-26 23:40:54 | Re: RPM Morgue |