Re: status/timeline of pglogical?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
Date: 2016-05-13 01:51:20
Message-ID: CAMsr+YEZfFOrqkE9z8N=CHO9T6Vi2F6V0YJ+DNWVELgM2OSsVA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 13 May 2016 at 02:13, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> I am not arguing with you but... good luck.
>
>
Yeah.

While we could get away without replay of old-version WAL for in-place
upgrade we'd need versioned catalog tuples, so we could read a catalog
tuple in the old version, convert it on the fly and write it out in the new
version when we modified it. And that's just for starters. I think it'd be
great, but it's no small amount of work.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shane Ambler 2016-05-13 03:28:59 Re: When should be advocate external projects?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-05-13 00:54:24 Re: When should be advocate external projects?