From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Brian Cloutier <brian(at)citusdata(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add PGDLLIMPORT lines to some variables |
Date: | 2017-11-21 01:26:29 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YETdvyXME8dsywVqR0SLbEn_row1xJ8r=v+DUOC8PBrew@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 November 2017 at 04:02, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please quote properly on postgres mailing lists... We're old school [tm].
>
> On 2017-11-20 11:58:44 -0800, Brian Cloutier wrote:
> > > please, append session_timezone to your list
> >
> > Here's a v2 patch which also includes session_timezone.
> >
> > Separately, is this the kind of thing which is eligible for backporting
> > into the next releases of 9.6 and 10?
>
> I don't think we quite have an established protocol for this. I
> personally, but I'm biased in this specific case, is that we should
> adopt a position that PGDLLIMPORTs should basically backpatched whenever
> a credible extension even halfway reasonably requires it. There's no
> easy way to get this done by default, and we're so far unwilling to just
> slap this onto every variable. So to not further disadvantage people
> force dto live in the MS environment, that seems the sanest
> solution. It's not like these are high risk.
>
>
+1
I'm all in favour of backports to the last supported release or the first
one the variable appeared in.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-11-21 01:29:50 | Re: Using isatty() on WIN32 platform |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-11-21 01:18:00 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort |