From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: AS OF queries |
Date: | 2017-12-21 02:46:08 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YEQugU_X+nEmZVtcvFOEXx5G=ti6SdYRw3krbiSN+Zapw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 December 2017 at 00:17, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/20/17 10:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Please say that's just an Oracle-ism and not SQL standard, because it's
> > formally ambiguous. This is required to work by spec:
> >
> > regression=# select x as of from (values(1)) t(x);
> > of
> > ----
> > 1
> > (1 row)
> >
> > so it's not possible for us ever to support an expression that includes
> > top-level "AS OF" (or, pretty much, "AS anything") without some rather
> > enormous pushups.
>
> The SQL standard syntax appears to be something like
>
> "tablename" [ AS OF SYSTEM TIME 'something' ] [ [ AS ] "alias" ]
>
> That's not going to be fun to parse.
Well, the SQL committe seem to specialise in parser torture.
Window functions, anybody?
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-12-21 02:46:27 | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-12-21 02:37:05 | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |