From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ruth Melendo <rmelendo(at)teltronic(dot)es> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgpool + BDR, is it possible? |
Date: | 2015-03-19 01:42:18 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YE8RaGGshY_-1LiQCvvp_3TO2zHL21-UqgWqPd_wR6dcg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
On 18 March 2015 at 21:47, Ruth Melendo <rmelendo(at)teltronic(dot)es> wrote:
> I don’t get this about the "peek" functions not the "get" functions ..
> What do you mean?
>
See:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/logicaldecoding.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/logicaldecoding-sql.html
You used pg_logical_slot_get_binary_changes . This consumes changes from
the slot. Don't do that on a slot used by something else. Use
pg_logical_slot_peek_changes or pg_logical_slot_peek_binary_changes .
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raghavendra | 2015-03-19 09:20:57 | Re: Posgres Query for Foreign Key Check |
Previous Message | Ankur Kaushik | 2015-03-19 00:19:52 | Posgres Query for Foreign Key Check |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tim Uckun | 2015-03-19 01:56:55 | Name spacing functions and stored procedures |
Previous Message | adityagis | 2015-03-18 14:20:32 | Archeiving and Purging |