| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | otheus uibk <otheus(dot)uibk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RustgreSQL |
| Date: | 2017-01-11 01:18:17 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YE6Cgdbojg=mOQfGCCsmhYRig3Ytt=PBX3upC5xzKer8A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10 January 2017 at 23:10, otheus uibk <otheus(dot)uibk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Craig, isn't it the case that C++ exceptions still cause tremendous
> slow-downs of the entire code-base?
No, and it hasn't been so for a long time even for gcc.
See e.g. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13835817/are-exceptions-in-c-really-slow
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-01-11 01:28:07 | Re: proposal: session server side variables |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2017-01-11 01:16:57 | Re: sequence data type |