Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready

From: Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready
Date: 2023-05-20 03:08:18
Message-ID: CAMsGm5evTkNxe1OgY6wOH9ASQbiKov22h0C1Z8rMqZZCQ57-bA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 19 May 2023 at 22:59, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> Sorry for changing the subject line.....
>
> these two commits seems not mentioned.
>

On a similar topic, should every committed item from the commitfest be
mentioned, or only ones that are significant enough?

I’m wondering because I had a role in this very small item, yet I don’t see
it listed in the psql section:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/42/4133/

It’s OK if we don’t mention every single change, I just want to make sure I
understand.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2023-05-20 06:59:46 Re: New COPY options: DELIMITER NONE and QUOTE NONE
Previous Message jian he 2023-05-20 02:59:20 Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready