From: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Recently-introduced segfault in initdb? |
Date: | 2018-03-18 16:33:57 |
Message-ID: | CAMsGm5eRSe0F+4KzzU114+e2fuPi0_TKPrcaEu-E6CHWfjkkxg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18 March 2018 at 05:57, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Isaac Morland wrote:
> > OK, I must have done something wrong with the bisect the first time. Now
> > I'm getting the following as the problem commit:
> >
> > fd1a421fe66173fb9b85d3fe150afde8e812cbe4 is the first bad commit
>
> Did you run "make distclean" before git-pulling? If not, maybe what you
> have is an incomplete rebuild after the code update. Unless you have
> --enable-depend in your configure line ...?
>
Thank you, and sorry everybody for the noise. Yes, I just did a "make
distclean" and then the build worked. Which still leaves the question of
why some commits work and others don't, but some mysteries just aren't
worth figuring out. I actually remember reading about distclean but didn't
think of it when I actually ran into the problem. Thanks again.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2018-03-18 16:39:16 | Re: [GSoC 2018] Proposal Draft |
Previous Message | Andrey Borodin | 2018-03-18 16:21:26 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |