Re: proposal \gcsv

From: Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal \gcsv
Date: 2020-04-07 10:48:59
Message-ID: CAMsGm5c1rqj_yBQrhHbO7Y=WX5oED-J-UidBQtiPeBt7sdOy-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 03:30, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> your patch supports syntax
>
> (option1=value option2=value)
>
> It looks little bit inconsistent and unusual
>
>>
It's the same as a connection string. Actually, maybe that's the key to
allowing parentheses, etc. in option values if needed - allow the same
single-quote quoting as in connection strings. Maybe even just call the
same code to do the parsing.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kashif Zeeshan 2020-04-07 11:03:46 Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2020-04-07 10:40:33 Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables