From: | Justin Arnold <jharnold81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade from 8.3.4 issue |
Date: | 2011-08-30 20:58:26 |
Message-ID: | CAMr08oDdqqtT8OAF=3qHFj7R1Ma7e_WoZZ-ouRmWfauvn=_GZw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks Tom and Merlin, I removed that logic from check.c, rebuilt, and it
worked fine.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > It looks like some time after 8.3 was released that function was
> > changed from returning 'record'. This is making me wonder if the
> > upgrade process was ever tested/verified on 8.3.
>
> Not lately, apparently :-(
>
> > I absolutely do not
> > advise doing this without taking a lot of precautions, but you might
> > force your way past that step with:
>
> I think it'd be a lot safer to modify (or just remove) the test in
> pg_upgrade. It looks like a one-liner:
>
> prep_status("Checking for prepared transactions");
>
> res = executeQueryOrDie(conn,
> "SELECT * "
> "FROM pg_catalog.pg_prepared_xact()");
>
> if (PQntuples(res) != 0)
> pg_log(PG_FATAL, "The %s cluster contains prepared transactions\n",
> CLUSTER_NAME(cluster));
>
> There's no reason at all for this code to not use the published API,
> which is the pg_prepared_xacts system view.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-30 21:17:16 | Re: pg_upgrade from 8.3.4 issue |
Previous Message | Jeff Ross | 2011-08-30 20:51:29 | FATAL: terminating connection due to conflict with recovery |