Re: Using composite types in psycopg3

From: Vladimir Ryabtsev <greatvovan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using composite types in psycopg3
Date: 2020-11-11 00:35:57
Message-ID: CAMqTPqmo=_Ev5R=0B93vgvxMf_RjiPkvJ_WqMEFbyK+Rx0MAsg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: psycopg

Awesome, thanks.

It would be great if it worked out of the box, as in other drivers.
Appreciate your efforts.

Vladimir

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 16:24, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 21:59, Vladimir Ryabtsev <greatvovan(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > psycopg2 returns the 'result' as a basic string, while
> > in asyncpg and py-postgresql I have structured data
> > (roughly 'List[Tuple[int, List[str]]]').
> >
> > I tried the same in psycopg3 and it is little bit better, but
> > not entirely: it shows the outer list, the tuples inside it,
> > but the innermost list is still represented as a basic string:
> > '{one,"one more"}'.
> >
> > Is it something you are still working on? Any workarounds?
> Yes: by obtaining data from the db in binary mode you can get
> information about deeply nested objects. psycopg2 works only in text
> mode, psycopg3 in both.
>
> In [1]: query = """
> ...: with test as (
> ...: select 1 as id, 'one' val
> ...: union all
> ...: select 1, 'one more'
> ...: union all
> ...: select 2, 'two'
> ...: )
> ...: select array(
> ...: select (id, array_agg(val))
> ...: from test
> ...: group by id
> ...: )"""
>
> In [2]: import psycopg3
>
> In [3]: from psycopg3.pq import Format
>
> In [4]: cnn = psycopg3.connect("")
>
> In [5]: cnn.cursor().execute(query).fetchone()[0]
> Out[5]: [('1', '{one,"one more"}'), ('2', '{two}')]
>
> In [6]: cnn.cursor(format=Format.BINARY).execute(query).fetchone()[0]
> Out[6]: [(1, ['one', 'one more']), (2, ['two'])]
>
> Binary loading/dumping is not supported yet for all the data types,
> but the plan is to cover all the builtins. Still not sure about the
> interface to request text/binary results, or whether binary shouldn't
> be the default as opposed to text. There is still ground to cover, but
> we are getting there.
>
> -- Daniele
>

In response to

Responses

Browse psycopg by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniele Varrazzo 2020-11-11 00:48:17 Re: Using composite types in psycopg3
Previous Message Daniele Varrazzo 2020-11-11 00:24:11 Re: Using composite types in psycopg3