Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.
Date: 2020-07-01 06:46:02
Message-ID: CAMp0ubcyAe9o4vUYFhi5C0FqvTM3zNgUiOLur7Kgmvg8h93NoQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 7:04 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Does anyone have any objections to that being changed?
>

That's OK with me. By the way, I'm on vacation and will catch up on these
HashAgg threads next week.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amul Sul 2020-07-01 07:00:29 Cleanup - adjust the code crossing 80-column window limit
Previous Message Amit Langote 2020-07-01 06:30:39 Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans