Re: Packages for pg_doorman

From: Smolkin Grigory <smallkeen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Brian Cosgrove <cosgroveb(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bradford Boyle <bradford(dot)d(dot)boyle(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Packages for pg_doorman
Date: 2025-03-16 13:23:26
Message-ID: CAMp+ueZONqwTHtN7SWo2GTv1Vbpu6agqpgTbBRQ-o4wmWcrbwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-debian

> For such a new piece of infrastructure is there really a compelling
reason to support distributions older than Debian bookworm (released 3
years ago)? Do you have any current use-cases for something older?
>

Well, only for the sake of user-friendliness to the people on really old
distributions, if it will not come at the price of real pain in our
backsides. We ourselves use only ubuntu:22.04 for now.

And I'm sure that vendoring will be of great help here.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-pkg-debian by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Smolkin Grigory 2025-03-19 05:39:31 Re: Packages for pg_doorman
Previous Message Brian Cosgrove 2025-03-16 11:30:29 Re: Packages for pg_doorman