PostgreSQL performance GNU vs LLVM

Logged by: arjun shetty
Email address: arjunshetty955(at)gmail(dot)com
PostgreSQL version: 13.4
Operating system: RHEL8.4
Description:

TPCH Results(Query Response Time(Q1 to Q22):
-------------
VU GCC Clang clang-with-llvm Clang(make file
code removed -flto
=thin to flto)
vu
1 7185 6349 4410 9984
2 7302 7352 4307 9990
3 6233 6749 4544 9698
4 6701 6328 3701 10878
5 7105 7376 5829 10991

Note: clang-with-llvm: JIT OFF.

TPCC Results(NOPM)
------------------
vu GCC Clang Clang-with-llvm
Clang(make file code removed -flto =thin to flto(regluar flto)
16 921489 967234 946472
963300
52 1655840 1779333 1683924
1713926
68 1765030 1787377 1810060
1835825
170 1894382 1986746 2034823
1938886
192 1739617 1901906 1929656
1912524
210 1610512 1801849 1674440
1715523
230 1830690 1825760 1799097
1708821

1.Regaular LTO not performs better than Thin LTO ? is regular LTO not
supported in postgresql?
2.Is specific reason need to use -flto=thin(clan13)?
3.TPCH(Clang-llvm)performs better than GCC/Clang(others) but why
TPCC(Clang-llvm) not performs better than GCC/Clang-other (performance
deviation is less)

the results captured in bare Metal(HP Environment) and benchmark Env
HammerDbv4.2